A Secret Weapon For h4831sc
A Secret Weapon For h4831sc
Blog Article
This is purported to be the "visit" powder-or darn close to it- for almost any bottle-necked cartridge just one could handload. It is the foundation for a great number of pet loads, yet I have never been pleased with the outcome.
In relation to bench rest matches, Hodgdon® rifle powders have posted more wins than all other propellants merged. A high-quality extruded powder, it flows precisely and easily by way of steps and provides match-grade precision when put to implement.
4gr of H4831sc and Federal 215 primers. I found this combo makes .5MOA groups with velocity about 3020fps from a 26" barrel. I exploit this very same powder in my 300wm taking pictures 180gr tablets, so It really is nice to have one powder for the two.
Run your load up with the precise powder (sc or frequent) and large amount you're applying although. Identical melt away rate doesn't mean it'll behave "precisely" exactly the same. I have observed above a hundred fps difference between sc and mil-surp a great deal of H4831.
INgunner54 said: It has been a bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to test. Observed a node and shot some groups.
I'm sure, tough times. H4831SC will certainly get the job done, I just did not like the situation density when loaded very long. I don't keep in mind powder demand off the highest of my head but I was launching a Berger 168gr VLD at three,000fps which can be exactly where I ordinarily intention to become. In your scenario utilizing what you may have h4831 vs h4831sc (and what I must have finished) I'd get started with the end on the bearing surface with the bullet correct within the shoulder/neck junction, and flirt with extending seating depths from there as soon as you find a velocity node.
Nampa, Idaho In my knowledge the only real distinction would be that the shortcut meters far better by means of reloading machines. The moment It is really loaded theres no useful change. I have listened h4831sc to which the shortcut can have a tiny little bit faster burn up level but it seems insignificant.
Although this is probably accurate, there is a ton far more to it than just not blowing your self up. He could not hit prairie pet dogs outside of about 150 yards, so I am guessing that inconsistent combustion wasn't accomplishing nearly anything favorable for his grouping skill with those loads.
The main reason I switched from IMR 4831 to H4831 was to take full advantage of the temperature insensitivity of the Hodgdon extreme powder.
Furthermore, it goes on to claim that because of the fshorter grains, that load density could be somewhat better.
Despite the similarity in nomenclature, they're totally various powders, with IMR 4831 getting considerably more rapidly in comparison h4831sc to the Hodgdon variants. You should not handle them as precisely the same powder, since they most unquestionably will not be.
The "SC" means Short Minimize. I haven't noticed a distinction between either powder dut I don't Imagine I might blend them.
Both provide the Exact burn fee, quick cut is available in helpful For anyone who is at max fill instead of at pressure/velocity that you want you can find extra shortcut inside of a situation.
The container didn't possess the "Extreme" symbol on it. A coworker and I then swapped some powder, and I wound up with One more pound of H4831SC, this a single with the "Extraordinary" symbol on it.